Whenever a peace officer meets resistance in discharging any duty, what must they do according to the Code of Criminal Procedure?

The proper course of action when a peace officer meets resistance while discharging their duties, according to the Code of Criminal Procedure, is to command citizens to overcome that resistance. This reflects the authority given to peace officers to take control of situations and maintain order. By doing so, the officer can effectively manage the scenario, ensuring both the safety of themselves and the public while upholding the law.

This approach emphasizes the officer's role in maintaining peace and preventing further escalation by seeking active cooperation from the public. It aligns with the responsibilities of officers to de-escalate situations while also ensuring compliance with lawful commands. Commanding assistance from civilians is a tactical measure that can help to resolve situations more safely and efficiently, demonstrating the proactive nature of law enforcement in community engagement.

The other options diverge from this established protocol. For instance, requesting backup from state officers may be appropriate in certain situations but is not mandated by the Code of Criminal Procedure as a direct response to resistance. Retreating from the situation could lead to further disorder and is against the principle of public safety and law enforcement responsibility. Calling for assistance from the mayor is impractical and not within the immediate scope of authority a peace officer has during a moment of resistance.