What legal action can be taken if a tenant refuses to leave after a writ of possession is issued?

When a writ of possession is issued, it authorizes law enforcement to physically remove a tenant from a property if they do not vacate voluntarily. This legal document signifies that the landlord has received the necessary court approval to regain possession of their property after a tenant has been evicted through the court system.

Forceful removal is the appropriate course of action because it ensures that the order of the court is enforced. Law enforcement officers are typically responsible for executing this action, and they have the authority to aid in the physical removal of a tenant in a manner that adheres to legal standards and protects the rights of all parties involved.

In this context, task force intervention, indirect eviction, and advance notice requirement do not align with the procedure following the issuance of a writ of possession. Task force intervention suggests a collective response not applicable in standard eviction processes, while indirect eviction refers to methods that aren't legally sanctioned for removing tenants. An advance notice requirement implies that tenants should be informed ahead of time, which is not necessary once a writ is issued as it already denotes that the legal process has concluded. Thus, forceful removal is the correct and necessary legal action to take under these circumstances.