What does the term 'reasonable doubt' signify in a criminal trial?

The term 'reasonable doubt' signifies a standard of evidence required for conviction in a criminal trial. This standard reflects the principle that in order for a jury to convict a defendant, they must be convinced of the defendant’s guilt to the degree that there is no reasonable doubt in their minds. This means that the evidence presented must be so compelling that a reasonable person would not have a lingering uncertainty about the guilt of the accused. This standard is a fundamental aspect of the criminal justice system, ensuring that the presumption of innocence is maintained and that an individual cannot be found guilty unless there is a high level of certainty regarding their culpability.

In a criminal trial, the burden of proof lies with the prosecution, and they must meet this standard to secure a conviction. If there's any reasonable doubt, the jury must acquit the defendant. This principle protects against wrongful convictions and is essential for upholding justice and fairness in legal proceedings.